|
WASHINGTON - The
chairman of the House Judiciary Committee is threatening to subpoena
Attorney General John Ashcroft because the Justice Department has
rejected a committee request to reveal how it is using new
anti-terrorism powers to monitor Americans.
In
a letter sent to the Judiciary Committee Last week, Bush
administration officials refused to detail how often they have used
the new powers under the USA Patriot Act.
Justice Department spokeswoman Barbara Comstock said
Tuesday the information would be sent to the House Intelligence
Committee. Other House members could request it from there,
she said.
The Judiciary chairman, Rep. James Sensenbrenner,
R-Wis., noting that his committee is responsible for monitoring the
Justice Department, said he expects to receive the information by
Sept 1.
"I've never signed a subpoena in my 5-1/2 years as
chairman," Sensenbrenner said in an interview with the Milwaukee
Journal Sentinel. "I guess there's a first time for
everything."
Comstock said the Justice Department has an army of
lawyers working to answer many of the questions asked by
Sensenbrenner's committee, which are complicated and require
research.
The USA Patriot Act, signed by President Bush last
year, gave the government broad new powers to monitor people in the
United States if they are suspected to have ties with
terrorists. The Patriot Act expands the FBI's power to tap
telephone calls, demand records from bookstores and libraries and
enter places of worship.
In
early June, Sensenbrenner and Rep. John Conyers, the ranking
Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, sent Bush officials 50
questions seeking details on how often law enforcement agents have
used the new powers.
The Justice Department sent replies to some of the
questions in late July but left many of the most important
unanswered, according to Jeff Lungren, a Judiciary Committee
spokesman.
Very
little is known about how often the government relies on the Patriot
Act in the terrorism investigations. In July, several
libraries across the nation said FBI agents had demanded information
on reading
records. |